Director: Brian Singer
Cast: Tom Cruise, Kenneth Branagh, Tom Wilkinson and Bill Nighy
I remember reading this old Mad spoof on World War II movies some years back, which lampooned the changing face of the Nazi/Japanese prison commandant over the decades. According to its timeline, the films made during wartime and soon after always depict these commandants as lean, blood-guzzling embodiments of evil, subjecting their malnourished and hapless Allied prisoners to all manner of ignominy in order to satisfy their insatiable malice towards all things decent. Over the course of the feature, as the years pass and Hollywood mellows, these villains become increasingly sympathetic, eventually seen going into paroxysms of despair every time one of their valued prisoners needs to be sacrificed to the whims of their country's wayward leadership (even the prisoners grow more and more understanding of this unwelcome necessity). By the end of the feature you can't tell apart the prisoner from the prison guard, both looking equally contented with their respective stations in life (which are not so different after all), lounging around and tossing back gin rickeys and sharing stogies, fondly discussing that steadily impending day when peace would arrive with a big grin and handshakes all around.
The function of Mad, of course, is to exaggerate the truth: which, in this case, refers to Hollywood's enduring and constantly evolving obsession with World War II drama. We've seen massive epics that chronicle the war and its atrocities from a deific perspective, action thrillers that glorify violence and create unlikely heroes, human dramas that examine the intricate interplay of lives caught in the chaos, and even the odd satire that pokes holes in our inflated sense of right and wrong. In all this abundance, however, there has always been a mild bias in these films (understandably so, given the dominant ideological leanings of the establishment, and the fact that war movies are automatically classified under Oscar bait): there is always a reluctance on the part of the average producer to tell stories about the lives of insiders in the Nazi administration. And, in my own roundabout way, this is where I introduce the movie under review here, the next step in Wartime Hollywood's evolution, a mainstream film that has dared to let slip that there were a few Germans too who exhibited extraordinary courage and heroism during those morbid times: Brian Singer's Valkyrie, a LeCarre-style retelling of a foiled military coup in Nazi Germany.
Starring Tom Cruise in an impeccably restrained lead role as Colonel Claus Von Stauffenberg, Valkyrie is really not worthy of the negative criticism it's been recently recieving. If anything, it's Singer's triumphant return to form, drawing reservior-loads from his knack for essaying a suspenseful plot (as seen in the brilliantly entertaining The Usual Suspects – the title of which, ironically, refers to a witty piece of dialogue from Casablanca, another great World War II thriller). It hinges on the unsuccessful fifteenth and final plot to assassinate Hitler, audaciously perpetrated on 20th July 1944 by Stauffenberg, a Strangelovesque figure with several integral parts of his body missing, and his high-ranking cronies. The plan is for a group of rebel politicians and high militia to sever the current head of state, and then use the altered provisions in a continuity-of-government operations plan called 'Walküre', or 'Valkyrie', to disarm the SS and assume leadership of the country, thereby allowing the new government to broker a hasty peace with their enemies before Europe is laid to waste. Everything in the plan is worked out and accounted for with characteristic Teutonic accuracy, except for circumstance.
Cruise, in his modulated performance, is supported by a group of the best dramatic talents that Singer could muster from across the Atlantic – Bill Nighy, Tom Wilkinson, Kenneth Branagh, Terence Stamp and, improbably, comedian Eddie Izzard, among others. Valkyrie's greatest strength and one minor flaw both come from this talented gang of Brits. The acting's spot on, but between Cruise and the limeys, all the good guys in the movie have distinctly Allied accents, while the baddies, deliberately or not, all sport camp German accents of the ve-haf-vayz-of-making-you-talk species. Distractions notwithstanding, the film's pacing and unimposing direction coerce you to ignore all such eccentricities as the plot races ahead. Singer's ability to keep things taut makes a wincing, squirming fool out of you – you know exactly what's going to happen, as per History's incontrovertible testimony, but you can't help hoping in your heart of hearts that Stauffenberg will somehow be successful at his mission. It's a strangely disconcerting feeling.
This article appears in the final issue of The Bengaluru Pages, dated March 1 2009.
13 comments:
ooh, the bengaluru pages.
Strictly freelance. (A little birdie tells me that this next one's going to be TBP's RIP issue. Sad. You didn't here it from me though :P)
awwww.
of course, it's on your damn blog in a comment attributed to you.
BUT. i didn't hear it from you. :P
Call it a glitch in the Matrix.
ok im very sure i posted a comment for this.. sigh.. i hope you're not cutting me out of your blog, eyefry?
]anyway, trying this again.. i havent seen valkyrie but im very suspicious of a bunch of german soldiers speaking in british/american accents (from what i gather from the trailer), tho i agree it wldve been weird if they all went about saying 'achtung' and 'ja!' and so on..
but i 100% agree that tom cruise is fab, from a few good men to minority report.. really underrated and so much better than fellow-sex-symbol brad pitt, in my humble opinion. at least he doesn't seem hung up on appearing gorgeous in every scene.
Bloody embedded comment form always has problems. You're my one and only follower, dude. The day I cut you out of my blog will be the day the Internet King is assassinated by Pakistani gunmen, the Wikipedia's turned into a propaganda vehicle for Big Brother and the only Google search result you keep getting, no matter what you type, is "STFU".
It's a very entertaining thriller. You should watch it.
I agree about Tom Cruise being underrated, but I'm not too sure about the Pitt-Cruise comparison. Brad Pitt's an excellent actor in his own right. All you have to do, as a demonstration of Pitt's acting range, is put Se7en, Snatch, the Ocean's series and Babel side by side. I fact, I'll go one step further and say that while both Pitt and Cruise are excellent dramatic actors, Pitt may be a far better comedic actor. You've got to face it, the guy's got amazing timing, dude.
well i haven't seen benjamin button (the story sounds horribly unappealing) so i don't know.. but if you're talking about his dramatic range, all of the movies you mentioned, his character was not THAT different. they were all standard hollywood fare, apart from snatch - where his character was fairly similar anyway - and babel where he had a small role. he does the ocean's eleven thing remarkably well, but that's as far as i'll go. you may be right about his comic timing, but i'd never ever agree that pitt is as good a dramatic actor as cruise, and am mildly shocked you put them in the same league.
in a few good men, the whole thing rested on cruise's shoulders PLUS he had the added pressure of matching what was surely jack nicholson's best performance ever..
but i must add a disclaimer - my knowledge of both actors is based on a very limited range of movies, i'm not really into the kind of movies they choose to do.
I don't understand why you didn't want to post this. Felt the film was a bit...cold. But that may be only because I dislike Tom Cruise. Hm.
Abhinav: Ah, to each his own. To prolong this debate would get us nowhere, considering it seems largely based on personal opinion anyway.
Nina: Not very happy with it, as far as review-writing goes. I get what you're saying, about the coldness (there was a very limited exploration in the screenplay of the human side to the drama -- nothing much apart from the cursory sub-plot of Stauffenberg's family. Then again, more such concessions would've resulted in a very different movie, detracting from the overall 'thriller' feel... Um, but I may be talking through my ass.) You dislike Tom Cruise AND Tom Hanks? But they're both very good actors! Or do you just dislike people called Tom?
btw, i actually thought this was a really good review - i liked that you started off by talking about Mad, it really served to illustrate the point you were making about this movie. too often we have this formula with regard to reviews - start with a sentence which catches the gist of it, then a bit about the direction, then acting, then the plot, and finally, as an afterthought, lighting and choreography. (i've done it tonnes of times)
this was - dare i say it - my fav review that you've done.
Abhinav, you're much too kind. I mean it. Far too much. I'm pretty sure this is the clunkiest thing I've written. But thanks! :P
(Note to self: I really, really must stop giving gift nags the old orthodontic.)
pouring a little on an extinguished fire - Fight Club, anyone?
I was going to suggest it at one point as well. So yeah, sure.
Post a Comment