When Kulbhushan met Stockli: A comics collaboration between India & Switzerland
Edited by Anindya Roy
HarperCollins, 2009,
pp 272, Rs 699
I hate to complain about writing this review even before I’ve started it (and now that I’ve said “I hate to complain”, there’s no going back), but reviewing a collection of stories is no cakewalk. Keep still, because I’m going to tell you why. With an unnecessarily complicated musical analogy. Yes, please do sit down.
We’re well into the age of indiscriminate playlist shuffling now, so you’ve probably forgotten those stressful times of the mixed tape. The mixed CD was far simpler to make, so that history is deservedly ignored. It’s the tape recorder that really gave music a bit of dimension. Why? Because it was ridiculously difficult to create the perfect mixed tape. You had to think hard on the dominant mood of the tape, what artists to pick, which of their albums to choose what songs from and the order to put the songs in. Recording that mixed tape needed some serious planning. And hardcore editing skills, let’s not forget. You had to get the pauses between the songs right, decide whether putting Biddu and The Stone Roses on the same tape was justified (not!) — what if the prospective listener was potentially a fan of both artists? (not even then!) — and if the cover should bear amateur skulls-bullets-and-flowers-style artwork or just neat lettering (always the latter — ALWAYS!).
Making the tape was only half the bloodshed. Next came the listener reactions. The hugs, the shrieks of delight, the awkward silences, the polite thanks. These reactions, like the tape itself, had a gruesome conceptual history. Some listeners assessed each song on its separate merit, some looked at overall intent, some weighed the whole thing against the compiler’s personality. Each reaction came with severe personal biases, and each listener thought s/he was right.
Are you with me so far? Good. You must be wondering what happened to the much-publicised book review, now that this article’s half over. This is exceptionally bad form for a piece of journalism, but to be perfectly honest, this isn’t a review at all. It’s really a defense. Much of this rant has been a response to some negative press in one of our national dailies for the book under review here. I know I’m treading on dangerous ground by contextualizing my article with another review, but I’m stupid like that.
That other review dissected the anthology, comic by desperate comic, tearing into each teeny chunk, commenting derisively on panelling and layouts and other poorly understood technical doohickeys. No mention of ideas or styles or intent or overall execution. No mention of storytelling. Only the little nitties and sordid gritties. Nasty stuff. Little did Anindya Roy, the ambitious editor of the collection, know of this impending mauling when he began mixing his precious set. If he knew, he might not have brought all those great Swiss and Indian writers and illustrators together to collaborate on this singularly fun exercise of defining a place by not defining it at all.
Or maybe he would’ve just gone ahead with all of it anyway, as, well, he did. It takes blood and guts to make a good compilation, you know. Which brings me back to my original point. There is no easy reaction to an effort such as this (at least, not within our current space constraints), except a vague fusion of embarrassment and affection. The only decisive personal opinion I have is the thrill of having partaken of the first Indian effort I’ve seen at curating a graphic travel anthology. Oh yes, there’s the inevitable bad art and gormless writing that have been diplomatically included, but the total effort is a fine entertainment. And that's the best critique this space allows me, I'm afraid.
What, you demand a review of greater depth? I refuse. Instead, here’s a list of what I like most about mixed tapes: they require hard work to create, they showcase diversity, you can play them whenever you need a break from the delicious monotony of listening to entire albums, and they give you the Zeitgeist on a light, snacky platter. Enlighten me: what’s not to like?
In the Sunday Herald, The Deccan Herald, 21st March 2010
31 comments:
:) mixed tapes ftw! i also miss recording off the radio.
ok i got to go read this compilation now
Pave: Oh yes, that too! Do you remember Times FM in the evenings?
Chait: I'm glad you feel that way (even though my anti-review says nothing at all about the book in question, heh). You're welcome to borrow my copy.
times fm?
who was on it?
You are from Madras, aren't you? Whole bunch of people RJ'd for it (so far as I remember... was Radio M and Times FM the same?) including Geoffrey Thomas, Freddy Koikaran and a still-wet-behind-the-ears Nikhil Chinapa.
But I could be wrong.
yes man. madras wonly. didnt sound like the name of the station tho... it was called something else? i dont remember.
There was Radio M and Times FM. Not sure if they were part of the same shtick or what.
For some reason, I still remember part of the postal address they used to give out at the end of each show -- '6D Gangagraha'. Strange how memory works.
i remember freddy... but think i listened more to people like niladri/melvin? (to complain about how annoying they were)...and there was this rajeev guy who i remember thinking was really cool. diff station?
Oh yes, I remember Niladri and Rajeev! I think it was all Times FM. From what I recall, there was some problem with procuring licenses for English radio stations in Madras for the longest time, so there was only this one station around. And I think it was first called Times FM, which then went on to become Radio M (?).
i have this feeling it had another name... but dangit i cannot remember. wil make enquiries!
You know, this hand-wringing really isn't worth the time or effort we're putting into it :P
lol true. but it makes me feel senile :D
It might help to take the more positive approach, that your brain's just doing what's good for you: filtering out the random crap you're better off without!
nice! evolution working in my favour and all that :D
In the sage words of Boris Yelnikoff: "Whatever works."
good movie?
Vintage Woody Allen. Vaguely reminiscent of 'Hannah & Her Sisters'.
:) wil give it a shot. larry david usually pains me tho..
Me too. He's tolerable in this one, though. And part of the way through the film the supporting characters suddenly take over the narrative, which is a refreshing break from David's pitiless mix of preening and whining.
hee thats a good description of him. curb your enthusiasm was deeply torturous. dont think there were any non sane people in it - he'd be an ass, they'd overreact.. hilarity did not ensue.
oops meant: sane*
I've only watched a couple of episodes of it. Not my kind of entertainment. 'Whatever Works' works because Larry David's mostly just channelling Woody Allen (or, rather, the vaguely ineffectual but hilarious central protagonist he plays in all his movies). And the writing's top class.
th last woody allen movie i watched was 'anything else', n he's got this violent/demented thing going on as well.
I haven't seen that one. I did watch three of his last four films set in Europe, however, (except for 'Cassandra's Dream') and uniformly enjoyed all of them.
you should find the guy in the basement of kasi arcade and send him a copy of this....
Re: The radio nostalgia
I think it was Rainbow, AIR 107.4 FM! Used to religiously tune in everyday. It was the only dose of Western music on the radio those days.
Karthik
"the zeitgeist on a nice snacky platter"- love it. this could be a description of 1) my breakfastime repast of filterblog linkies 2) the cutely eloquent NPR show This American Life 3) or the name of immodestly priced tapas at a trendy new NY non-hotel.
where's your review? would be curious to read it.
"the zeitgeist on a nice snacky platter"- love it. this could be a description of 1) my breakfastime repast of filterblog linkies 2) the cutely eloquent NPR show This American Life 3) or the name of immodestly priced tapas at a trendy new NY non-hotel.
where's your review? would be curious to read it.
Anon: If that guy's still in the basement of Kasi arcade after all these years, he deserves nothing less.
Shruti: Danke. It seemed to agree with my inner dilettante.
There was no review. In place of it was this extended apology. Most unprofessional.
I do have several strong opinions about the book, actually. Now they shall be reserved for unleashing on moments of great social awkwardness.
Well, good, so long as you have a real review in you. You know how i personally consider "reviews of reviews (of comic books!)" irksome, right? On this one's account, I'll reserve judgment because I don't suppose I read the reviews properly. But I do think comix is a largely misunderstood/misappropriated terrain among reviewers and consumers in india. it's alot more varied and flexible than they realise.
Post a Comment